Larimer and Weld counties, Colorado

Loveland council advances charter review committee plan after amending selection and outreach rules

From the Loveland City Council meeting of

The Loveland City Council voted unanimously Tuesday on first reading to create a nine-member ad hoc charter review committee to study possible amendments to the city charter for a future ballot. Before approving Ordinance 6841, council rewrote key parts of the proposal to…

The Loveland City Council voted unanimously Tuesday on first reading to create a nine-member ad hoc charter review committee to study possible amendments to the city charter for a future ballot. Before approving Ordinance 6841, council rewrote key parts of the proposal to require the full council to score applicants in public, expand the interview pool to at least 22 candidates, add two alternates, require members to be Loveland residents for at least one year and registered electors, and require a public engagement plan within 60 days of the committee’s first meeting.

The committee would review the charter and return with recommendations for council, which would then decide what, if anything, to refer to voters. City Attorney Vince Douglas said the committee itself would not have authority to change charter provisions on its own. Responding to public concerns about voter-approved measures, Douglas said the committee could discuss provisions such as Charter Amendments 300 and 301, but only the council could place any repeal or revision before voters.

Douglas told council the committee route was chosen instead of a statutory charter commission because it offers more flexibility and avoids a more cumbersome state process. He said staff’s initial focus includes administrative and legal cleanup items, such as publication requirements, election procedures and charter language that conflicts with court decisions, but he emphasized the committee would be free to examine any part of the charter.

Public comment focused heavily on transparency and on whether past voter-approved measures could be reopened. Darren Barrett urged the city to consider a charter survey and said the committee should reflect a wide range of viewpoints and knowledge of Loveland history, law and the current charter. Cindy Van Slambroek said the process needed to build trust and include people who represent residents who backed previous charter changes by large margins. Chuck Hubbard also pressed for transparency, including public ways to contact committee members.

Much of the council debate centered on how applicants should be screened. Mayor Pro Tem Andrea Samson proposed replacing the original screening model — which would have relied on the mayor, mayor pro tem, city manager and city attorney — with scoring by the full council during an open meeting. That amendment passed 9-0. Council then voted 9-0 to increase the number of applicants advancing to interviews to no fewer than 22 and to appoint nine members plus two alternates.

A third amendment, approved 7-2, tightened eligibility so members must be Loveland residents for at least a year and registered electors within the city. Council Member Sarah Rothberg objected to the one-year residency rule, saying it could exclude someone with valuable expertise who moved to Loveland recently. Some members also discussed whether people with a Loveland mailing address outside city limits should be eligible, but Mayor Patrick McFall and others argued the committee should be limited to residents who can vote on city charter issues.

Council later unanimously added a requirement that the committee produce a formal public engagement plan within 60 days of its first official meeting. Council Member Laura Light-Kovacs said she wanted to avoid vague promises of outreach and make sure the committee spelled out how it would gather public feedback during its work.

Council members also discussed the timetable for launching the process. Douglas said the committee likely would begin meeting in late fall after applications and interviews, though members pushed staff to move quickly enough to keep potential ballot timing in view. McFall said the city should prioritize doing the process correctly over rushing it, and he indicated a special meeting could be used if needed to keep selections on schedule.

The ordinance now heads to a second reading, where council can give final approval before applications open and the selection process begins.

More from this meeting

  1. Loveland City Council July 7: charter review committee plan advances as council also clears CDBG actions

    At its Tuesday, July 7 meeting, the Loveland City Council advanced a plan to create a charter review committee and also moved through a mix of housing, administrative and code-related business, including two Community Development Block Grant actions needed for the city’s federal…

  2. Loveland City Council approves appointments to three boards and commissions

    The Loveland City Council voted 9-0 Tuesday to approve a slate of appointments to city boards and commissions as part of its consent agenda. The action fills vacancies on the Human Services Commission, the Construction Advisory Board and the Loveland Communication Advisory Board.

  3. Loveland council approves corrected CDBG resolution after funding total was overstated

    The Loveland City Council voted Tuesday to approve Resolution #R-34-2026, correcting an earlier Community Development Block Grant funding resolution after staff found the available brick-and-mortar funding had been overstated. The action rescinds and replaces Resolution…

  4. Loveland council unanimously approves annual CDBG plan after debate over broader housing policy

    The Loveland City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to approve Resolution R-35-2026, adopting the city’s 2026-27 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan. The action clears the way for Loveland to submit its HUD-required annual application for federal CDBG money,…

  5. Loveland council unanimously approves remaining consent agenda items in bundled vote

    The Loveland City Council voted 9-0 Tuesday to approve the remaining consent agenda items in a single bundled vote after pulling Items 4.3 and 4.7 for separate consideration. The package covered Items 4.1, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6, combining board and commission appointments,…

  6. Loveland council approves first reading of ordinance updating municipal penalty limits

    The Loveland City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to approve the first reading of Ordinance 6842, updating the city’s penalty code to match a recent Colorado Supreme Court ruling. The measure amends Section 1.12.010 of the Loveland Municipal Code so the city cannot impose…

  7. Loveland council approves first-reading funding for city manager search

    The Loveland City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to approve first reading of Ordinance 6843, authorizing a supplemental budget appropriation to hire an executive search firm for the city manager recruitment and related public outreach. The funding clears the way for staff to…

  8. Loveland council approves downtown right-of-way encroachment permit fees

    Loveland City Council voted Tuesday, 7-2, to approve Resolution R-39-2026, adding a new fee schedule for revocable right-of-way encroachment permits. The measure creates application and annual renewal fees for private features that extend into public space, including patios,…

  9. Loveland unveils Community Placemaking Department name for consolidated city services

    Loveland publicly unveiled **Community Placemaking Department** as the new name for the city division that combines the library, cultural services, and parks and recreation. The announcement came Tuesday during City Council Item 1.5, a presentation rather than a substantive…

  10. Loveland public comment centers on transparency, moratorium rules and homelessness concerns

    Public comment at Tuesday’s Loveland City Council meeting was dominated by recurring complaints about transparency, a recent council change to moratorium rules, homelessness policy and the city’s handling of public process. Several speakers told council they felt residents’…